We use cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. By continuing, we assume you agree to this.

Find out more

Association for International Affairs

Select ongoing project:

Close

Breaking:

Babis’s ANO movement wins Czech elections. What next for foreign and European policy?

Why Not Reject Visegrad?

Vít Dostál Vít Dostál / Ed. 2. 7. 2017
Why Not Reject Visegrad?
photo DNESKY.SK

With launching the infringement procedure against the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland for non-compliance with their obligations related to the refugee relocation scheme, the Visegrad Group (V4) hits the headlines of main news portals. What is the shape of the Visegrad Group nearly two years after it has started its fight against the binding relocations? Why it cannot (or does not want to) get rid of the trouble maker’s label and why we should keep it, despite its poor image?

The chat between V4 foreign ministers at Bratislava Globsec conference (minus Czech foreign minister Zaorálek, who sent his deputy) offered a picture which says a lot about the current shape of the regional grouping. The first half of the conversation was full of ministers’ complaints on how the perception of the V4 as the EU’s main trouble maker is inaccurate and exaggerated. Ministers stressed that it was rather the Netherlands (which blocked the EU’s Association Agreement with Ukraine), or Greece (which caused serious problems in Eurozone), and not the Visegrad Group countries. Their only “sin”, they argued, had been that the four object to the binding relocation scheme.

Read the full article here.

Originally published: Why Not Reject Visegrad?

Pass
Tags
Tags
Czech Republic 461
European Union 312
Hungary 34
Poland 181
Slovakia 49
Visegrad Group 196
migration 52
YOUR FEEDBACK IS APPRECIATED
Submitted, thank you.
If we may be of further assistance, please let us know!
  • Complete all fields please. Complete the highlighted items please. Sorry, something went wrong. Contact us at info@amo.cz please.