We use cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. By continuing, we assume you agree to this.

Find out more

Association for International Affairs

Select ongoing project:


Why Not Reject Visegrad?

Vít Dostál Vít Dostál / Ed. 2. 7. 2017

With launching the infringement procedure against the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland for non-compliance with their obligations related to the refugee relocation scheme, the Visegrad Group (V4) hits the headlines of main news portals. What is the shape of the Visegrad Group nearly two years after it has started its fight against the binding relocations? Why it cannot (or does not want to) get rid of the trouble maker’s label and why we should keep it, despite its poor image?

The chat between V4 foreign ministers at Bratislava Globsec conference (minus Czech foreign minister Zaorálek, who sent his deputy) offered a picture which says a lot about the current shape of the regional grouping. The first half of the conversation was full of ministers’ complaints on how the perception of the V4 as the EU’s main trouble maker is inaccurate and exaggerated. Ministers stressed that it was rather the Netherlands (which blocked the EU’s Association Agreement with Ukraine), or Greece (which caused serious problems in Eurozone), and not the Visegrad Group countries. Their only “sin”, they argued, had been that the four object to the binding relocation scheme.

Read the full article here.

Původně vyšlo: Why Not Reject Visegrad?

Czech Republic 541
European Union 344
Hungary 78
Poland 217
Slovakia 94
Visegrad Group 230
migration 58
Odesláno, děkujeme.
Máte na srdci ještě něco? Sem s tím!
  • Prosím vyplňte všechna pole. Doplňte prosím zvýrazněné položky. Stala se chyba. Kontaktujte správce.
Sign up for updates